All about the object-oriented programming language C#. WCF supported MSMQ, although then you really are in for a lesson in pain. It's not Berkeley sockets so I guess I should be delighted they bothered to provide the awful HttpClient at all. I'm really moaning about nothing. ChannelFactory will hurt you unless you already understand WCF. Grauenwolf is mostly correct.

I looked at the example (admittedly quite a few years ago now) and thought: 'You lazy fucks' and never went back. I asked the question because I saw someone ask something else about Web.API recently and it reminded me that I've been meaning to ask for like. Channelfactory works because the SOAP endpoint defines all possible messages and all possible responses through its WSDL. This allows.NET to define all the objects you're communicating with through templating and give you all the code you need to interact with the service automatically. REST APIs don't do this.

Theoretically you could build a HATEOS API that would allow a lot to be derived by a determined crawler, but it'd be a nightmare, and I've never seen one written that way that also has static content you could do that with. It's not a matter of lazy, it's just not possible to build an interface like that over rest. You can build some really good tooling for http calls, and they have, but it's not RPC, and you can't do RPC with it. On the other hand, the code you didn't write for WCF is hugely complex and very heavy and God help you if you need to deviate from it. HttpClient makes rest calls. That's what webapi is.

Today is one of those awesome days if you are building stuff on.NET platform. Microsoft announced bunch of stuff at keynote a few hours ago and one of them is, a free and stripped down version of Visual Studio which works on,. It leverages bunch of existing open source software like,. Most of all, this was my #bldwin wish:) Changing my mind, my wish announcement: VS for Mac.— Tugberk Ugurlu (@tourismgeek) First of all, you should definitely install Visual Studio Code and start checking the which is very extensive.

Visual Studio for Mac is now generally available and can be In this episode, Robert is joined by Mikayla Hutchinson to talk about Visual Studio for Mac, a full-featured IDE built natively for the Mac.

I followed those steps and as I am very excited about this new tool, I wanted to share my experience thus far which is not much but very promising. First thing I noticed was the top notch support for.

Is pretty good but some features are not highlighted there. For example, you are getting the IntelliSense for dependencies: When you add a dependency, you get nice notification telling that you should restore: Pretty nice! So, how would you restore? Hit ⇧⌘P to get up and you can see the restore command there: It will run the restore inside the terminal: You can also: Obviously, you can. Is also very slick! You currently don’t have all the nice refactoring features you have in full fledged Visual Studio but it’s still impressive: We even have some advanced stuff like: Check out.

As mentioned Windows is also fully supported as you might guess:) I want to touch on the as well. I generally use Git bash and this won’t change for me but having the diff view inside the editor in a very nice way is priceless! How about old/current.NET applications?

I managed to get one up and running easily and managed to get the build working by for that. I doubt we will see the full Visual Studio on Mac and Linux, because it's built on WPF. WPF was never implemented in Mono, and there does not seem to be any plans from Microsoft to port it to.NET Core.

I had been wondering about that when they annouced support in ASP.NET 5 for Mac and Linux. I think a lightweight tool like VSCode is a great idea. I bet the agenda here is to seduce developers from the OpenSource world (and keep the existing.NET developers), and they tend to use lightweight code editors and the command line (see the Ruby on Rails, Python and Node.js stacks). ASP.NET 5 and VSCode fit perfectly. Reusing the existing tools like Yeoman for scaffolding ASP.NET 5 apps was a brilliant idea. Why reinvent the wheel after all? Personnally, as a.NET developer but a Linux fan, I've wanted the possibility of programming ASP.NET apps in Linux for a long time, but Mono and Monodevelop were never up to it.

I've been dabbling with Node.js, and the new editor and command-line tools make me feel right at home. I'll be eagerly waiting for ASP.NET debugging support. How to add network printer on mac.